You also need to worry about how expanding borders can anger nearby civs and potentially lead to war. Not only do you have to worry about the upkeep costs for your soldiers, you also have to worry about how rapidly you can deploy them between cities that are spread out from one another, which affects how quickly you can deploy reinforcements. This becomes a slippery relationship to maintain, and it's something to consider before going wide in Civ 6. You don't need to play Civ to know that the more an empire expands its borders and has more territory to defend, the more troops that empire needs to protect those borders. wide: The more cities you own in Civ 6, the more deadly wars can become You can focus on spending production on the buildings that grant you more science, versus spending the same production on entirely new cities. Therefore, playing tall in Civ 6 might make the most sense if you're going for a scientific victory, garmeth06 argues. Civilization city spamming: The relationship between population and science has changed in Civ 6Īccording to redditor garmeth06, citizens in Civ 6 produce fewer science resources than citizens in Civ 5, so where going wide in Civ 5 made sense as the highest population provided the most science, in Civ 6 buildings, districts and special persons are more important in determining science resource production. wide for over a week, and which choice you make seems to depend mostly on science and war. Players on the Civilization 6 subreddit /r/civ have been debating the question of tall vs.

In Civ 6, keeping your civilization strong and growing requires hundreds of decisions, and one of the most basic is whether or not you want to play 'tall' or 'wide.' Tall means having fewer but more powerful cities, and wide means having more but less-powerful cities.

Civilization 6 multiplayer lagging out